Dokeo vs Otterly AI
Otterly AI helps you draft.
Dokeo scores the finished piece
We gate our own blog. Scored 17 October 2026 with the same engine you get, glossary rules, balanced strictness.
Solo marketers and small teams that want an affordable AI-visibility tracking dashboard.
Teams that want to enforce a consistent citation-readiness standard on every piece before it ships, in CI.
Otterly tells you what AI cited. Dokeo makes sure the next piece will get cited.
The gate is deterministic: the same draft returns the same verdict every time, which is what makes it safe to block a CI pipeline on.
- SEO, AEO, and GEO checks run in a single pass, across all 17 supported content types.
- Every FAIL names the specific check that failed and why.
- 100 free scans a month, no credit card, same gate as production.
When in the workflow
Otterly polls AI engines and tracks your citation share over time. Dokeo runs against your draft in CI and tells you whether the draft is citation-ready before you ship. One is observation; the other is enforcement.
| Feature | Otterly AI | Dokeo |
|---|---|---|
| When | After publish (monitoring) | Before publish (gate) |
| Pricing | From $29/mo (Lite) | From $0 free tier to $499/mo |
| Blocks a build? | ✗ | ✓ |
| Engine coverage | ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Copilot; Gemini and Claude as add-ons | Citation-readiness checks |
Different layers of the same problem
Most teams using Otterly eventually want to know: can I prevent this problem next time? Dokeo is the answer. Together: ship citation-ready content with Dokeo, monitor actual citations with Otterly.
| Feature | Otterly AI | Dokeo |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-publish enforcement | ✗ | ✓ |
| Post-publish monitoring | ✓ | Citation watch (prompt monitors, share of voice) |
| Audit log + exports | Not listed | ✓ |
| GitHub Action + MCP + CLI | API and MCP on Standard and up | ✓ (public Action) |
FAQ
Should I use Otterly or Dokeo?
They live in different parts of the workflow. Use Dokeo to enforce citation-readiness at publish time. Use Otterly to track what actually got cited. Together they answer: will this rank AND did it rank.
Is Dokeo a competitor to Otterly?
No - different layer. Dokeo is the gate (pre-publish); Otterly is the monitor (post-publish). The two-camp framing (editor vs monitor) leaves a gap; Dokeo fills the gate gap.
Does Dokeo track AI citations like Otterly?
Mainly no. Dokeo's core job is scoring citation-readiness before publish (the cause). Otterly tracks actual citations after publish (the effect). Dokeo also has Citation watch for prompt monitors and share of voice, but if tracking is your main need, Otterly is built for it.
Ready to pass the gate?
100 free scans every month, no credit card, and you can cancel anytime.